EU positions

Spawned by a discussion on the crack bored of whether or not Europe supports the apparently imminent U.S. attack on Iraq, I began compiling a list of European countries and their stances. Updated until my curiosity is assuaged (yes, I just wanted to use assuaged). List of countries comes from the official European Union site.

Members of the European Union
Country	Government position	Popular position	Notes
Austria	against w/o new U.N. resolution1		haven't found official position yet. link states that until the U.N. explicitly authorizes a use of force, that Austria's territory and airspace cannot be used.
Belgium	against (translation)
Denmark	for		position deduced from this news article. however, i haven't found an authoritative source yet.
Finland	against w/o new U.N. resolution1
France	against		has stated that it's position will change if Iraq uses chemical weapons against the U.S.
Germany	against
Greece	non-committal
Ireland	non-committal
Italy	for		does not state explicitly that it favors unilateral action (and statements in January make clear the Italian government believes that the U.N. should be the guiding body on Iraq). however, the Italian government disagrees strongly with the French approach and states that it is Iraq's duty to prove it has disarmed, rather than the U.N.'s duty to prove it is still armed. overall, they seem to be in the for column, although perhaps not as strongly as the U.S.
Luxembourg	against
Netherlands	for		Pulled from this A.P. news story.
Portugal	for		Supports the attack, according to this article.
Spain	for		According to the A.P., Spanish troops will only actin support role. Will not participate in attack.
Sweden	against w/o new UN resolution 1
United Kingdom	for		Labour party of P.M. Tony Blair is not solidly behind their leader's stance wrt Iraq.
European countries not part of the EU
Country	Government position	Popular position	Notes
Albania	for 2		U.S. counts Albania as a coalition member, according to this.
Andorra
Belarus
Bosnia-Herzegovina	non-committal
Bulgaria	for 2		U.S. counts Bulgaria as a coalition member, according to this.
Croatia	for 2
Cyprus
Czech	for		key phrase in statement: The Czech Republic therefore welcomes the continued multilateral approach favoured by the U.S. U.S. counts the Czech Republic as a coalition member, according to this.
Estonia	for 2		U.S. counts Estonia as a coalition member, according to this.
Hungary	for		U.S. counts Hungary as a coalition member, according to this.
Iceland			Not sure. This statement uses strong language, but doesn't really commit to anything. I suspect that this is a for statement, but it's hard to tell.
Latvia	for 2		U.S. counts Latvia as a coalition member, according to this.
Liechtenstein
Lithuania	for 2		According to this, Lithuania will not provide troops but will provide humanitarian aid as well as use of bases and airspace. U.S. counts Lithuania as a coalition member, according to this.
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia	for 2		U.S. counts Macedonia as a coalition member, according to this.
Malta
Moldova
Monaco
Norway	against
Poland	for		U.S. counts Poland as a coalition member, according to this.
Romania	for 2		U.S. counts Romania as a coalition member, according to this.
Russia	against
San Marino
Serbia and Montenegro	non-committal
Slovakia	for 2		U.S. counts Slovakia as a coalition member, according to this.
Slovenia	for 2
Switzerland	against
Turkey	undecided		Pulled from this New York Times article.
Ukraine	against
Vatican City	against		From linked statement: The Holy See maintains that there are still peaceful avenues within the context of the vast patrimony of international law and institutions which exist for that purpose.

¹ Countries that have stated they do not support the attack without a second U.N. resolution may in fact support strong military action. Where I could find it, I note when the country has made clear an intention to vote for a use of force resolution.

² The Vilnius Group of countries support a resolution laying out demands and explicitly authorizing force should the demands not be met. However, I have found no documentation regarding their support for a unilateral attack without another U.N. resolution.