kingrat: (Default)

Born Into Brothels finally came up in my Netflix queue. What an amazing film. I kind of expected along the lines of isn't it sad about the poverty these children live in. There's some of that, but the movie is more a celebration of the talent of the children profiled.

Zana Briski has been living and working with the prostitutes of Sonaguchi, one of Kolkata's red light districts. She gave a number of children cameras and taught them photography. I knew the film was to feature their photography, but in the long wait I'd forgotten this. So when the first photographs came up I was just amazed at their quality. It was only a few minutes later that I realized the photos were all taken by the children.

Briski worked to get the children admitted to boarding schools, with partial success. Along the way, the photographs were exhibited in the U.S. and Europe, with the proceeds going to pay for the schools.

Avijit seemed to be the most talented. This was one of his where he picked up a bucket of water and sand and poured it out to put something in both the foreground and background. They don't have many of their photographs online, but follow the link below to see a few of what they do have.

Kids with Cameras is now setting up similar projects in other countries.

kingrat: (Default)

I've got a few more Kurosawa DVDs in my queue to see what I am missing. Is Kurosawa as great as his reputation? So far, I didn't get Ran but I thought Rashoman was awesome. High and Low was nice, but nothing out of this world in my book. There were some fine acting performances, but they are hampered by the screenplay. Gondo, for instance, is portrayed as a snappish loud man. His manner doesn't show any of the reasons why he is willing to help his chauffeur despite all his protestations that it will ruin him. And the movie doesn't have the cinematography of the other Kurosawa movies I've seen.

Overall, nice movie. Nothing horrible about it. But nothing to prove Kurosawa's genius either. But then, none of them are geniuses every time out.

kingrat: (CDs)
I watched the Battlestar Galactica mini-series on DVD last night after I got back to the hotel. I really liked this version. The personal conflicts dovetailed nicely with the overall story, although they were pretty cliché. But they were still well done. I loved how the makers weaved the theme of sin and retribution throughout the plot, both the personal interactions as well as the overall human/Cylon circumstances. Being the first in an eventual series, it would have been nice had the explained why the Cylons revolted and why they exhibited such savagery in this war. Rymer also did a nice thing with Baltar's guilt and attempts to save his own skin. How he accuses someone else of crimes to cover his own. I thought they might be leading up to the result that happened, but I wasn't quite sure.
kingrat: (CDs)

Holy shit! Rent this movie. Tony Jaa can do things humans should not be allowed to do. Here's the story: Don, a Bangkok criminal, tries to buy an amulet off a villager. Villager refuses to sell, so Don steals the head of the village's Buddha in retaliation. Villager named Ting (Tony Jaa) volunteers to get it back. He goes to Bangkok, meets up with a criminally oriented cousin who doesn't want to help him. They eventually do work together to retrieve Ong-Bak (the head from the statue) from a big criminal gang that is into drugs as well as boxing and the betting thereon. There's a lot of fighting.

Story is dumb, but you expect that. The fight scenes, awesome. Think of Jean Claude van Damme only 5 times better. And without the fast camera switches. In fact, throughout the movie on cool shots, they replay the action from two or three different angles. I think just to show you they didn't gimmick it. And you get to see the piece again without hitting replay.

Now that Jackie Chan no longer does the cool stunts and has much lamer fight scenes, Tony Jaa will be the one I go to see.

Closer

Sep. 5th, 2005 03:54 am
kingrat: (CDs)

I rented this movie mainly cause I wanted to see a scantily-clad Natalie Portman. It's the geek in me. Though all the scantily-clad parts I'd seen already on the net. So I'm not sure what I was looking for. The movie didn't really deliver whatever it was though. Ms. Portman is in a state of undress, but it weren't sexy. And the movie was dull, I couldn't follow the time breaks, and I don't get why Alice lied about her name all the way through. Not to mention I just can't see anyone acting like they do, particularly the behavior exhibited by Clive Owen and Julia Roberts' characters. Jude Law seems to be making a career of playing cads though.

kingrat: (CDs)

So reading about Les Invasions Barbares you'd think it was a great masterpiece. It isn't. Not in my book. But it is a nice movie about dying. Basically, successful son who doesn't really get along with his father returns home to care for him after the father is diagnosed with a terminal illness. Most of the movie is vignettes as various lovers and friends return to be with him during his last days. Gradually, the vignettes show a rapprochement between father and son. And friends, lovers, and family all participate as the father decides to terminate his own life. There's nothing profound here, but the characters are all very human and that's what makes it watchable. Even the junkie the son recruits to give his father heroin when the hospital can't give him enough painkillers.

Overnight

Aug. 8th, 2005 07:39 am
kingrat: (CDs)

Since I mentioned it as well, I did like Overnight. Kind of like the Metallica documentary, this one was originally commissioned by Troy Duffy's band The Brood just after Troy Duffy got his movie deal with Miramax. The band still didn't have a deal yet. And like Metallica, I don't think it ended up showing the group in the light they really wanted. Though in this case it was more Troy Duffy himself.

The show starts off from the point where Troy Duffy got his movie deal. Prior to that he was a bartender at a low-rent Hollywood bar. Almost from the beginning you can see Troy Duffy being an arrogant prick. Through his attitude, he manages to piss of everyone. The people paying him. His band. And in a telling fit, after the band's managers complain about getting no money when they sign them to a record deal, Duffy tells them they don't deserve anything. Guess who is making the documentary? Yup. The managers. In the end, the fuckwad made them see the money in the documentary that they didn't see from the record deal. Cause they could have made the documentary make Duffy look like a driven mover & shaker. Instead, he appears to be a manic depressive asshole. I think the latter is the truth, but had he been a bit nicer to his friends at least, they could have hidden the mistreatment of everyone else.

Anyway, in the end Troy Duffy blew the little money he made and everyone goes back to day jobs.

kingrat: (CDs)

Just watched The Boondock Saints on DVD. Frankly, I don't see what all the fuss is about. Not bad. Not particularly good either. Rips off a lot of other movies. I didn't really see anything original in it. Afterward, I watched Overnight about the director, Troy Duffy. I definitely could see Duffy's worldview in the movie. Black and white. Everyone is for you or against you. Evil or good. Anyway, not a bad effort, but I'll wait for it to be on TBS to watch it again.

kingrat: (CDs)

I've actually only watched one episode of this show on T.V., but that was enough to intrigue me. So I've purchased all three seasons on DVD. I think the only thing that frustrates me about this show, especially season 3, is the lack of the story arc. I'd really love to see movement on one of the two major issues in Monk's life: the case of his wife's murder, or getting re-instated to the police force. Not that I need to see him solve that case or be reinstated. But in 16 episodes, you'd think they'd go back to these parts more than just the first episode of the season. But they didn't really, despite several episodes with dream sequences with his wife.

I've loved police procedurals in the mystery novel genre, and generally like them as T.V. shows. Monk is great for these. It's like Encyclopedia Brown for adults. And despite the fact that Monk's phobias invariably pop up at the worst possible time, and it can usually be predicted, the writers always seem to make the occurrences fresh.

Open Water

Jul. 6th, 2005 09:51 am
kingrat: (CDs)

I watched Open Water on DVD over the weekend. This was the indie movie set in the Atlantic where a couple go on a diving trip, only to surface and find their boat has returned to port without them. I thought the movie was decent, though nothing to write home about. The ads for the show promoted it as somewhat scary and tense. It wasn't really. It worked more as a vehicle for exploring what catastrophe does to a relationship, as the couple floating in the ocean pretty much have nothing to do besides talk. Throw in a few sharks and drinking salt water when you shouldn't, with the occasional boat passing in the distance or plane flying overhead. It doesn't put in much more plot devices than that sort of thing. Still, not bad. And mercifully short at 81 minutes.

kingrat: (CDs)

I just watched Metallica: Some Kind of Monster, a documentary made during the writing of their album St. Anger. Even if it is long (2½ hours), it's an excellent movie. But not because it gave me any insight into Metallica's creative process or anything. It was something else.

First, I have to say I am more a casual fan of Metallica than I am die-hard. Much more casual. I don't think I heard of them before And Justice For All's One video made M.T.V. back in the day when M.T.V. played videos. The only album of theirs I've listened to in its entirety is the black album. So my opinion won't mean shit to the die-hard fans.

And my commentary on this isn't because the documentary revealed Metallica to be something I didn't think them to be. While many bands, particularly those in the metal genre, started off as hard-partying youngsters, as they age they are likely to morph into something else, at least behind the scenes. That much was apparent for Metallica when they all chopped their hair years ago and started having kids and whatnot. Fuck, even Ozzie with a brain like swiss cheese spends a large amount of his time like Martha fucking Stewart. That was the real reason for the popularity of his reality show, The Osbournes. It wasn't that he was fucking crazy. I think we all expected that after years of taking too many drugs and his legendary antics. What made that show what it was placing the crazy in what often appeared to be normal settings that many of us experience and then letting the insanity loose. But I digress. I expected Hetfield and Ulrich to be middle-aged behind the scenes.

So what revealed itself to me in the documentary? It was the utter inability of this group of men to live without a full time psycho-babble therapist in their midst. Even to the point that they were worried he thought he was in the band, and yet they still couldn't give him the boot. I've had my own experiences with therapy. There's good therapy, and there's meaningless babble. And watching 2½ hours of therapy sessions where everyone spouts mindless drivel disappoints me. It would disappoint me if it was my family, if it was my friends, my (nonexistant) girlfriend, or anyone I would think to be the no-bullshit intelligent type. And I always thought of Metallica as the no bullshit band. And I was wrong. They were disappointingly human in a way I did not expect. Men who could not be honest with each other after over 20 years together. They couched their statements to avoid blame. They manipulated each other. They chased off Jason Newsted, which though it might have been good artistically, was done primarily because Hetfield had to maintain the upper hand. These people were fundamentally dishonest with each other and afraid of themselves.

And that insight is what I gained from the documentary.

kingrat: (Default)

I should also mention that I watched Ghost World with [livejournal.com profile] vorona, [livejournal.com profile] vulture23, and Jason at [livejournal.com profile] izador's place Thursday night. A pretty good movie, although I am about burned out on teen movies of any kind for a while. Not just the regular Julia Stiles type teen movies, but also the angsty type teen movies as well.

There was one scene in the movie where a drunken, depressed, and feeling unloved Enid (Thora Birch), seduces the middle-aged Seymour (Steve Buscemi). Ivy commented, "I think this happens to every man over 40 at least once." Score! I think I have something to look forward to after I turn 40!

Although I should say that my experiences with drunken, depressed, feeling unloved women have been as a whole rather a let-down. Sad to say, I think I would turn down such an experience in the future, even if she was a hot 17 year old Thora Birch.

Profile

kingrat: (Default)
kingrat

July 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415 16 1718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 15th, 2025 08:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios