kingrat: (Default)

One of my favorite charity efforts is Con Or Bust, which, in association with the Carl Brandon Society, sends fans of color to science fiction conventions. I love it for its single-minded-ness as well as the fact that I think it's a worthy goal to diversify science fiction. The effort is funded through donations and t-shirt sales, but most of the money comes through an annual auction held on their LiveJournal community. People donate all sorts of things for the auction, but there are usually quite a number of books. This year's auction ended on Sunday. I bid on a number of items and ended up winning a bunch of books.

My haul )

The auction is still over but they are still selling t-shirts and taking donations. I picked up one of the shirts at WisCon last year. Nearly every time I wear it someone strikes up a conversation with me over what it means. It's a great conversation starter.

Con Or Bust shirt (red)

Cross-posted from Read Irresponsibly.

kingrat: (Books)

According to Kim these are the top 106 most unfinished books according to LibraryThing.

Bold are the ones I've read. Strike-through indicates I started but didn't finish. I've also noted the ones I read for school. Yeah, I'm doing my formatting different.

  • Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell
  • Anna Karenina (school)
  • Crime and Punishment
  • Catch-22 (don't remember it though)
  • One Hundred Years of Solitude
  • Wuthering Heights
  • The Silmarillion
  • Life of Pi : a novel
  • The Name of the Rose
  • Don Quixote
  • Moby Dick
  • Ulysses
  • Madame Bovary (school)
  • The Odyssey
  • Pride and Prejudice
  • Jane Eyre
  • The Tale of Two Cities
  • The Brothers Karamazov (currently own, haven't gotten to it yet)
  • Guns, Germs, and Steel: the fates of human societies
  • War and Peace
  • Vanity Fair
  • The Time Traveler’s Wife (currently own, haven't gotten to it yet)
  • The Iliad
  • Emma
  • The Blind Assassin (I'll get back to again some day)
  • The Kite Runner
  • Mrs. Dalloway
  • Great Expectations
  • American Gods
  • A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius
  • Atlas Shrugged (I need to read this so I understand the kooky side of libertarians)
  • Reading Lolita in Tehran : a memoir in books
  • Memoirs of a Geisha (currently own, haven't gotten to it yet)
  • Middlesex (was thinking about making this my next book)
  • Quicksilver
  • Wicked : the life and times of the wicked witch of the West
  • The Canterbury Tales
  • The Historian : a novel
  • A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man (currently own, haven't gotten to it yet)
  • Love in the Time of Cholera
  • Brave New World (currently own, haven't gotten to it yet)
  • The Fountainhead (same comment as previous Ayn Rand book)
  • Foucault’s Pendulum
  • Middlemarch (school)
  • Frankenstein
  • The Count of Monte Cristo
  • Dracula (currently own, haven't gotten to it yet)
  • A Clockwork Orange
  • Anansi Boys
  • The Once and Future King (might have read this)
  • The Grapes of Wrath (school)
  • The Poisonwood Bible : a novel (currently own, haven't gotten to it yet)
  • 1984
  • Angels & Demons
  • The Inferno
  • The Satanic Verses
  • Sense and Sensibility
  • The Picture of Dorian Gray
  • Mansfield Park
  • One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest
  • To the Lighthouse (school)
  • Tess of the D’Urbervilles
  • Oliver Twist
  • Gulliver’s Travels
  • Les Misérables
  • The Corrections
  • The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay
  • The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time
  • Dune
  • The Prince
  • The Sound and the Fury
  • Angela’s Ashes : a memoir
  • The God of Small Things
  • A People’s History of the United States : 1492-present
  • Cryptonomicon
  • Neverwhere (can't remember if I finished this, so it goes here for now)
  • A Confederacy of Dunces (currently own, haven't gotten to it yet)
  • A Short History of Nearly Everything
  • Dubliners
  • The Unbearable Lightness of Being
  • Beloved
  • Slaughterhouse-five
  • The Scarlet Letter (school)
  • Eats, Shoots & Leaves (currently own, haven't gotten to it yet)
  • The Mists of Avalon
  • Oryx and Crake : a novel
  • Collapse : how societies choose to fail or succeed
  • Cloud Atlas
  • The Confusion
  • Lolita
  • Persuasion
  • Northanger Abbey
  • The Catcher in the Rye
  • On the Road
  • The Hunchback of Notre Dame
  • Freakonomics : a rogue economist explores the hidden side of everything
  • Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance : an inquiry into values
  • The Aeneid
  • Watership Down (school)
  • Gravity’s Rainbow
  • The Hobbit
  • In Cold Blood : a true account of a multiple murder and its consequences
  • White Teeth
  • Treasure Island
  • David Copperfield
  • The Three Musketeers

ARC haul

May. 31st, 2007 02:32 pm
kingrat: (Default)
Got a haul of Advance Reading Copies of books today. Normally, when the Random House rep comes by, there's one or two I want. Today he brought a larger stash than usual, and a number seemed interesting.

Acacia / David Anthony Durham
tentative on-sale 19 Jun

Send / David Shipley and Will Schwalbe
available now

New England White / Stephen L. Carter

Gifted / Nikita Lalwani
available Sept

You Don't Love Me Yet / Jonathan Lethem
available now

The New World / Michael A. Stackpole
available 26 Jun

Walla Walla Suite / Anne Argula
available 18 Sept
kingrat: (Books)

Yup, I want to do this. First up, a poll. I've poked through the books in the top ten to see what is decently short and what is decently cheap. The following books are nominated to be the first book in the Ten Most Harmful Books Club:

  • The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels. Editions:
    • Signet paperback, 80 pages, $5.95
    • Charles H. Kerr pamphlet, 60 pages, $5
    • Free on the internet
  • Introduction to Positive Philosophy, Auguste Comte. Editions:
    • Hackett paperback, 84 pages, $6.95
    • Free on the internet
  • Beyond Good And Evil, Friedrich Neitzsche. Editions:
    • Penguin paperback, 250 pages, $9.60
    • Digiread paperback, 108 pages, $6.95
    • Free on the internet

The other books on the list were over 300 pages (my arbitrary cut-off) and a bit more pricy (though several do have free versions on the internet). If this is successful, longer ones can be used for subsequent books.

Voting closes Friday morning when I wake up. Approval voting is used. That means vote for whichever of these books are acceptable to get you to participate. You don't have to pick only one.

Approximate schedule will be: 1 week to purchase book. After that, I'll post questions and discussion topics approximately weekly, free-wheeling flaming to occur in comment threads. Last week in April I'll host an in person 10 Most Harmful Book Club discussion, with food and drink. Those who participate will get, in addition to food and drink, double votes on the next selection.

Edited to Add: Please just hit submit if you don't plan to participate but want to see what wins the poll. I'd rather only people who plan to participate choose the book. (If your plans to participate fall through, we'll revoke your vote later, then hunt you down.)

[Poll #940327]

Also, I know I typo'd Nietzsche. Deal. Can't fix a poll once it's posted.

kingrat: (Books)
Looking over the Hugo award winners for the last few years, I notice that Lois McMaster Bujold has won a few times for best novel. I haven't read anything by her yet. Am I missing out? Should I pick something up (and what)? Or are her wins a product of the fact that the Hugos are a popularity contest?
kingrat: (Default)
10 Most Harmful Books of the 19th and 20th Centuries according to a conservative group.

Anyone wanna join me?

Beyond Fear

Jan. 8th, 2007 10:13 am
kingrat: (Books)

Since I started putting my book reviews on Rat's Reading a year or so ago, I've stopped plugging the books here. However, I just finished reading Bruce Schneier's Beyond Fear, which I highly suggest folks go read. If you don't want to spend the $25 cover price (or whatever it's discounted to at major retailers), at least read his blog regularly. If the sorts of things the Bush administration is doing in the name of security tend to incense you like they do me, this book will give you a framework to understand how these things actually impact security (if at all), and give you ammunition against the emotional arguments the right wing uses.

Anyway, the review of Beyond Fear is up at Rat's Reading now. Go read it to get an idea.

kingrat: (Books)

This is a list of the 50 most significant speculative fiction/fantasy works, 1953-2002, according to the Science Fiction Book Club. Bold the ones you've read, strike-out the ones you hated, italicize those you started but never finished and underline the ones you loved.

  1. The Lord of the Rings, J.R.R. Tolkien long, over-written and over-wrought
  2. The Foundation Trilogy, Isaac Asimov
  3. Dune, Frank Herbert
  4. Stranger in a Strange Land, Robert A. Heinlein
  5. A Wizard of Earthsea, Ursula K. Le Guin
  6. Neuromancer, William Gibson
  7. Childhood's End, Arthur C. Clarke
  8. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, Philip K. Dick
  9. The Mists of Avalon, Marion Zimmer Bradley I haven't read this, nor is it likely I ever will
  10. Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury one of the best books ever
  11. The Book of the New Sun, Gene Wolfe
  12. A Canticle for Leibowitz, Walter M. Miller, Jr.
  13. The Caves of Steel, Isaac Asimov
  14. Children of the Atom, Wilmar Shiras
  15. Cities in Flight, James Blish
  16. The Colour of Magic, Terry Pratchett
  17. Dangerous Visions, edited by Harlan Ellison
  18. Deathbird Stories, Harlan Ellison
  19. The Demolished Man, Alfred Bester
  20. Dhalgren, Samuel R. Delany
  21. Dragonflight, Anne McCaffrey
  22. Ender's Game, Orson Scott Card though I'm not as high on this book as I used to be
  23. The First Chronicles of Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever, Stephen R. Donaldson
  24. The Forever War, Joe Haldeman
  25. Gateway, Frederik Pohl
  26. Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, J.K. Rowling
  27. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams some people will really like this if they are into humor
  28. I Am Legend, Richard Matheson
  29. Interview with the Vampire, Anne Rice
  30. The Left Hand of Darkness, Ursula K. Le Guin
  31. Little, Big, John Crowley
  32. Lord of Light, Roger Zelazny
  33. The Man in the High Castle, Philip K. Dick
  34. Mission of Gravity, Hal Clement
  35. More Than Human, Theodore Sturgeon
  36. The Rediscovery of Man, Cordwainer Smith
  37. On the Beach, Nevil Shute
  38. Rendezvous with Rama, Arthur C. Clarke
  39. Ringworld, Larry Niven
  40. Rogue Moon, Algis Budrys
  41. The Silmarillion, J.R.R. Tolkien based on my opinion of the Lord of the Rings, I will likely never read this
  42. Slaughterhouse-5, Kurt Vonnegut
  43. Snow Crash, Neal Stephenson
  44. Last Stand on Zanzibar, John Brunner
  45. The Stars My Destination, Alfred Bester
  46. Starship Troopers, Robert A. Heinlein
  47. Stormbringer, Michael Moorcock
  48. The Sword of Shannara, Terry Brooks
  49. Timescape, Gregory Benford
  50. To Your Scattered Bodies Go, Philip José Farmer
kingrat: (Books)

This book I picked up for 75¢ at the Friends of the Seattle Public Library book sale last year. Stuart Scheingold wrote this treatise in 1974. The Politics of Rights is a look at the means and theoretical effectiveness of cause lawyering. Scheingold is a political scientist. This is an academic book. It's dry. It's boring. I skimmed some parts. Most of it was uninteresting, except for where he identifies why simply winning a rights case isn't very effective, and but that having a judicial decision can be used as a base to energize and mobilize a constituency. Part three of the book examines the movers of shakers of activist lawyer (though not really by name). He breaks them down into three groups and then analyzes whether or not those groups will be effective in the long run. He concludes that a severe lack of excitement, numbers and funding will keep activist lawyers to a severe minority on the side of American politics. I mention this because I wonder what Sheingold thinks of this prediction 30 years later. Not sure I want to read any of his later books to find out if he changed his mind though. As I said, dry dry dry. Like the footnotes though. May go look up some of the book used in footnotes.

Scheingold, Stuart A.
The politics of rights : lawyers, public policy, and political change / Stuart A. Scheingold.
xiv, 224 p. ; 21 cm.
ISBN 0-300-01811-8
1. Law—United States.
2. Law and politics.
3. Civil rights—United States.
4. Lawyers—United States.
KF380 .S3
74-079972

kingrat: (Books)

Eighteen years and one day since I first read this book, I just finished my second reading of John Steakley's Armor. I vaguely remembered it as a takeoff on Heinlein's Starship Troopers. It's a different book though, with the similarity being armored humans fighting insect-like aliens. Only this one is done mostly in flashback mode. A scientist and an outlaw replay the wartime memories of an armored soldier taken from his suit of armor. He's a machine in a sense, divorced from his emotional self, as he fights the ants. He's the most fiercesome soldier humans have, and no one believes he's seen as much action. Mostly they think the number of times he's been dropped is a clerical error. Only he's running away from something, the loss of his wife. And also the fact that he's the ruler of Golden, a human planet, who disappeared after his wife's death. Sorry for the spoilers folks, but y'all wouldn't have read it anyway.

Steakley, John.
Armor / John Steakley.
426 pgs.
ISBN: 0-88677-368-7

kingrat: (Books)

Freakonomics has been getting a lot of press, so I picked up the book by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner. The former is the new economics wünderkind; the latter is a journalist who once wrote a story on him. Later, Dubner was talked into being the co-author of the book because Levitt felt he wasn't much of a writer. Levitt wasn't, that is.

My overall impression of the book is that it's a lot like reading something by John Allen Paulos. Both of them seek to explain the everyday. The major difference is that Paulos doesn't have a problem with writing about something that isn't novel. His treatise on the stock market doesn't really break any new ground, whereas Freakonomics is getting the raves because of Levitt's groundbreaking work on the drop in crime during the 1990s.

The big topic in the book is Levitt's proposition that Norma McCorvey is responsible for the massive drop in crime during the 1990s. As you recall from your high school civics (unless you went to a religious school like I did), McCorvey is better known as Roe in Roe v. Wade. Now an anti-abortion crusader, in the early 1970s she was just a poor woman who wanted to have an abortion but could not because it was against the law. After she won her case, abortion was generally legal through the U.S. (with some restrictions allowed on 3rd trimester abortions and notification and whatnot). The bulk of those getting abortions are unmarried poor women. Their unwanted children are more likely to live a life of crime. 15 years later, starting in 1990, crime rates began dropping. While Levitt doesn't argue that it is solely responsible for the drop in crime, he has some pretty convincing evidence that this case was a major contributor to the drop. His evidence? Several states (Washington among them) legalized abortion a few years before Roe v. Wade forced them. Those states experienced the drop in crime a few years before everyone else. In addition, those states with higher abortion rates have seen a larger drop in crime.

An overview of the rest of his topcis:

  • Cheating in the modern world, with examples from sumo wrestling and teachers who cheat on standardized tests. In particular, he has some convincing arguments on who cheated and how they were found.
  • The value of expert information. In this chapter, he explores how real estate agents work against their own customers, how Superman reduced the membership of the Ku Klux Klan, and how the internet is helping to reduce prices by spreading expert information to the masses.
  • How dealing drugs doesn't tend to make most drug dealers much money, at least in the inner city, and how that's pretty similar to other highly sought after glamor jobs in Hollyywood.
  • Most parenting skills that parents obsess about doesn't really change much about the kids, with evidence provided in the form of test scores. I kind of wish he dealt with other statistics other than test scores, but the evidence that parents make kids smarter by their parenting skills seems slim, particularly in reading. He states, but doesn't provide the evidence except in an endnote, that peers have a much greater influence on childrens' education. And he touches on the relative risks of catastrophe, particularly comparing the danger to children of guns in the household vs. the danger of swimming pools (the pool is more dangerous).
  • And lastly, he has a chapter on how parents name their children. Of interest is how your name is probably indicative of your mother's socio-economic status, particularly if you are black. And also how names cycle from being popular among the well-off, copied by the middle and then lower class becoming less popular among the rich, and then eventually dropping off the radar of the lower classes as they copy new names from the rich.

Definitely a most interesting book. Paulos gets points for explaining more things, but Levitt gets the points for talking about some more surprising things.

Levitt, Steven D.
Freakonomics: a rogue economist explores the hidden side of everything / Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J Dubner.
207 p.
ISBN 0-06-073132-X
1. Economics—Psychological aspects.
2. Economics—Sociological aspects.
HB74.P8L479 2005
330—dc22
2004-065478

kingrat: (Books)

Jason has been bugging me to read this book for a while and give him my take on it. I read another book on dyslexia a couple of years ago. After the initial review, I found even more information on it that pointed to that book's shortcomings. This one, Overcoming Dyslexia, by Sally Shaywitz, I have to say is much better. Still, this is no five star review.

The book covers 4 parts: the science behind reading and dyslexia, diagnosing dyslexia in children & adults, teaching reading in general, and teaching reading to dyslexics. I hold more confidence that the first two parts are solid than I do the latter two.

In part 1, Shaywitz explains the history of dyslexia, going back to the first doctors to identify it and related disabilities. Then she goes into what's missing in dyslexics: phonologic ability. Essentially the ability to automatically break apart words into their constituent sounds. According to the book, it's more fundamental than people typically think. The myth is that dyslexics see words and letters in the wrong order and position. According to the book, it can be found even without resorting to written matter. Dyslexics have trouble, for instance, breaking the word cat into the sounds of c, a, and t, when asked. Or at least they do at a young age. There are other indicators as well. But that's fundamentally the problem. If a dyslexic can't do that, they will also have problems associating alphabets with sounds. And according to the research she touts, it's sounds we understand, though good readers are so accustomed to converting to sounds and then understanding the words that the conversion happens without conscious recognition.

Part 2 is about recognizing dyslexia. There's a lot of references in these chapters to multitudes of tests that can determine if someone is dyslexic. Some are individually administered. Others are geared toward classroom testing to identify at-risk children. The biggest piece to take away from this section is to test early if there is any doubt that someone might be dyslexic. According to Shaywitz, early intervention is best. Can't disagree with that. If the premise of part 1 is correct, then part 2 is probably good as well. It tests for the things in part 1.

Where she starts going scattershot though is in part 3. The author was on the National Reading Panel (N.R.P.), which was a government panel to determine what programs were effective at teaching reading. Her claim is that the programs she lists are endorsed by that panel as generally effective as proven by scientific studies. Not necessarily for everyone, but on the whole they were the most effective programs. I haven't yet gone to the government web to verify her claims. Essentially the programs recommended were mostly based on phonics. She lists quite a few, though not Hooked on Phonics. I suspect the N.R.P. web site will have more thorough information. In addition, she also writes a bunch about some effective components of some of these programs, as well as useful things for parents to do. And even reading material for kids. She recommends Cricket for Kids, a magazine I loved as a child. I don't think my mom kept the back issues though. Her evidence that these programs and methods are effective though cannot be found in the book. Which is why I hope the N.R.P. has the info.

Her last section covers teaching reading to dyslexics. Accord to this book, the components are quite similar to effective methods for teaching everyone, but with more emphasis than ever on the phonics. There's a chapter in there on teaching reading to dyslexic adults, who have already worked around the phonologic issue but in a manner that hasn't made them fluent readers. Mostly these items suggest programs to use. The book doesn't cover a lot of specifics.

Throughout the book, there are a couple of items. First, she has lots and lots of external references. Sometimes it's to authority (e.g., the N.R.P.) and sometimes it's suggestions of programs and web sites. As I wrote, she even goes so far as to suggest reading material. The second item is that Shaywitz fluffs much of the book with cheerleading. Not for herself (mostly), but instead for dyslexics. She fills the book with uplifting tales of dyslexics who were amazingly smart people but because of their dyslexia had problems in school. Some of them are pseudonymed patients of hers, some are famous and semi-famous people. You too are amazingly smart, is the general gist of these anecdotes. The first thing noted was nice. The second got tiring.

Overall, I believe a worthwhile book though, even if the information isn't really as new or effective as the title suggests.

Shaywitz, Sally E.
Overcoming dyslexia: a new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level / Sally Shaywitz.
366 p.
ISBN 0-375-40012-5
1. Reading disability.
2. Dyslexia.
3. Reading—Remedial teaching.
4. Dyslexic children—Education.
LB1050.5 .S42 2003
371.91'44—dc21
2002-040621

kingrat: (Books)

Most of the books I put up here are ones I've read cover to cover. I need to get out of that habit for a couple of categories of books. One is reference books. The other category are books that I just gave up on and stopped reading. This book falls into the former. Essentially, A Waterfall Lover's Guide to the Pacific Northwest, published by The Mountaineers, lists many of the waterfalls, with a guide to how to find them, how difficult it is to get to them, and how nice they are to view. I've used it as a day hike book essentially. Some folks like to hike to the top of something. Some folks geocache. I like to use a waterfall as a destination. Now, my copy is the 3rd edition. He's got the 4th edition out now as well. And an online version as well. The online version doesn't have detailed instructions on how to get there or how nice these waterfalls are, but the pictures are in color and it does have links to U.S.G.S. topo-maps. Another thing to note about the book is that it doesn't always tell you everything you need to know. For instance, on National Forest land, hikers usually have to purchase a pass to leave on the dashboard of their car. This book didn't note that requirement even though the Forest Service put the requirement in place six years before the book came out.

I should note also the wonderful web site done by Bryan Swan Waterfalls of the Pacific Northwest. I like it better than the book, actually, but it doesn't have road maps so I don't use it as much. He's also behind a world waterfalls web site and has some great links to other waterfall web sites.

Plumb, Gregory Alan, 1956-
A waterfall lover's guide to the Pacific Northwest: where to find hundreds of spectacular waterfalls in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho / Gregory Alan Plumb.—3rd ed.
285 p.
ISBN 0-89886-593-X (3rd. ed)
ISBN 0-89886-911-0 (4th. ed)
1. Hiking—Northwest, Pacific—Guidebooks.
2. Waterfalls—Northwest, Pacific.
3. Northwest, Pacific—Guidebooks.
GV199.42.N69P58 1998
917.9504'43—dc21
98-036763

kingrat: (Books)

This is the third installment in Joe Haldeman's Forever series. In the previous installments, Earth has been at war with an alien race called the Taurans. Travelling at relativistic speeds, soldiers travel from planet to planet to battle. Because of relativism, soldiers have been fighting for thousands of years. They return every once in a while to find that man has changed. Many re-enlist. Eventually, humans on earth begin cloning themselves rather than breeding and when they get enough people with the same D.N.A. they develop a group mind by accident. Taurans have a group mind too. Then they realize they don't need to fight and the war is over, just waiting for the soldiers to find out. But on their return many of them don't like the idea of a group mind, and eventually many settle on the planet M.F. (euphemistically known as Middle Finger).

And that's where this book starts. Even there, the former soldier feel trapped. Man, the name for the human group mind, keeps them around for their genetic diversity, just in case. It's like a zoo. So they plan to escape. Head out from the galaxy perpendicular to the galactic plane. They plan to travel at relativistic speeds, returning 40,000 years later, though have aged only a couple of decades themselves. The idea being that the world will have changed by then and maybe they'll fit in.

Only something goes wrong. They lose their anti-matter and have no power to keep going. So most everyone returns to M.F. in the escape pods.

spoilers )

Yeah, it's an interesting premise, but the writing left me flat. Most of the book has no connection to the ending. It's like Haldeman had a cool idea, and then wrote 200 pages of filler and 70 of meat. I think this would have been better as a more thematically focused short story or novella. Except for the narrator and one Man, none of the characters ever was fleshed out to any degree. They just pop in and out when Haldeman needs a plot device.

So yeah, this was not tops on my list.

Haldeman, Joe W.
Forever free / Joe Haldeman.
ISBN 0-441-00787-2
274 p.
PS3558.A353 F59 1999
99-033231

kingrat: (Books)

I always seem to enjoy Uglytown books, and Dirt, by Sean Doolittle is no exception. This is a caper novel. The caper is Joel Moss, an undertaker, secretly disrupting one of his own funerals with a hired person in order to get a community group off his back so he can go back to fraudulently reselling burial plots. It spirals out of control from there. I dunno if I like it enough to get the second book by this author (Burn). If it involves the same characters, probably not. (This story shouldn't be the start of a series. It just wouldn't work.)

Doolittle, Sean, 1971-
Dirt / by Sean Doolittle.—1st ed.
ISBN 0-9663473-4-X
1. Undertakers and undertaking—Fiction.
2. Women journalists—Fiction.
3. Terrorism—Fiction.
PS3604.O65 D57 2001
2001-000710

kingrat: (Books)

Ten Big Ones
Janet Evanovich
Best Price $3.14
or Buy New $7.99
Privacy Information
And my vacation begins with bubblegum. As I've noted before, some of the Stephanie Plum novels I didn't like as much because the protagonist, accidental bounty hunter Stephanie Plum, always seemed to make the worst possible mistakes. However, in the last few novels Evanovich has Ms. Plum settling into her role so much better. Rather than get barrelled over by the easiest of catches, instead she's picking cars because they are inconspicuous, and turning the tables on one of Ranger's men. Nice light reading.

Evanovich, Janet.
Ten big ones / Janet Evanovich.
ISBN 0-312-93622-2 (pbk)
1. Plum, Stephanie (Fictitious character)—Fiction.
2. Women detectives—New Jersey—Fiction.
3. Murder for hire—Fiction.
4. Bounty hunters—Fiction.
5. Witnesses—Fiction.
6. Trenton (N.J.)—Fiction.
PS3555.V2126 T47 2004
2004-046684

kingrat: (Books)

Microeconomics
Heyne
Best Price $5.00
or Buy New $58.25
Privacy Information
I suppose I should put in something about my economics text, seeing as how I did read the whole thing for my class. Paul Heyne lectured at the University of Washington until his death in 2000. I've read that he was an excellent teacher, but at least this edition of his book is crap at least for learning well. Heyne presents concepts in a breezy, loosely structured manner. It doesn't make well for trying to apply the concepts, though it does do a pretty good job of imparting the gist of things. Perhaps it is perfect for an Econ for Jocks class. But I often found myself thinking, but I need clearer directions on how to apply this concept, or, i wish i had a definition for this term. Throughout the book are lots and lots of subtle and not so subtle conservative views embedded within the text. Heyne takes the view that absent compelling reasons otherwise, capitalist economics should be unregulated and unfettered. An example is the minimum wage, about which Heyne weaves an argument that raising the minimum wage results in lay-offs of lower-wage workers. The studies I've read don't support that. Or in an end-of-chapter question where he asks the question Why are the renters in New York City so rich? when in fact the data show that renters in rent-control apartments are overwhelmingly poor. There are some pretty good arguments against rent control (and I'm generally not in favor of the idea), but that isn't one of them.

Heyne, Paul T.
Microeconomics: the economic way of thinking / Paul Heyne.
ISBN 0-536-01907-X
1. Microeconomics.
HB172 .H525 1997

kingrat: (Books)

Just finished The Oregon Trail: Yesterday and Today by William E. Hill. Little bit of history. Lotta pictures. Not really much substance to it, but still kind of cool.

Hill, William E.
The Oregon Trail: yesterday and today.
ISBN 0-87004-319-6 (pbk)
1. Oregon Trail.
2. Overland journeys to the Pacific.
3. West (U.S.)—History.
4. West (U.S.)—Description and travel—1981- —Guide-books.
F597.H65 1987
86-6134

kingrat: (Books)

Blinded by the Right
David Brock
Best Price $3.75
or Buy New $10.20
Privacy Information
Just finished Blinded By The Right: The Conscience Of An Ex-Conservative, the memoir/tell-all by David Brock. Brock wrote for Insight and American Spectator, and also wrote an attack book on Anita Hill shortly after the Clarence Thomas nomination fight. However, in 1996 he published a book on Hillary Clinton that was widely expected to be an attack piece. When it turned out to be relatively balanced, the right wing disavowed him. In the years since, he wrote this book, and started Media Matters, a counter-information source on the right wing.

I don't know how much of the facts in the books can be independently verified. My guess is a lot of it is. It was interesting for a number of reasons. First, Brock is one of few who has moved from conservative to liberal. Second, the inside look at the attack media that nearly brought down Clinton and prevented from Gore from winning in 2000 is priceless. There really was a right-wing conspiracy, though it may not have been vast. Third, the insight Brock gave into how he thought and felt at the time, and what might have motivated him. However, that part seems to veer into the psycho-babble realm more than I like. Fourth, and last, he offers retractions and mea culpas on the prominent pieces he wrote. These days, it's rare to see any kind of substantive correction in the media at all, much less something as prominent as this book.

Brock, David, 1962-
Blinded by the right: the conscience of an ex-conservative / by David Brock.
ISBN 1400047285 (pbk.)
ISBN 0-8129-3099-1 (hardcover)
1. Brock, David.
2. Clinton, Bill, 1946—Adversaries.
3. United States—Politics and government—1993-2001.
4. Republican Party (U.S.L 1854- )—Biography.
5. Journalists—United States—Biography.
6. Conspiracies—United States—History—20th century.
7. Conservatism—United States—History—20th century.
8. Right and left (Political science)—History—20th century.
E886.2.B754 2001
973.929—dc21
2001-028853

Profile

kingrat: (Default)
kingrat

July 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415 16 1718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 06:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios