kingrat: (Media)
One of the things I routinely tell people is that if it's in the news, don't worry about it. By definition, "news" means that it hardly ever happens. If a risk is in the news, then it's probably not worth worrying about. When something is no longer reported -- automobile deaths, domestic violence -- when it's so common that it's not news, then you should start worrying.
Stolen from Schneier's blog. For those who aren't geeks, he's a cybersecurity type of person, though he often comments on other types of security as well.
kingrat: (Media)

Shocking, I know. But until recently, there was no statisticly significant evidence that police actually reduce crime. Generally, cities with more crime have more police. That fact makes it hard to tell if police reduce crime. In order to tell if police levels actually reduce crime, you need to remove the cause and effect. In other words, you need to find a period of time when police levels are increased for some reason other than increased crime. And that doesn't happen often. But 9/11 provided that. With the new terror alerts, some cities increased their police presence because the government terror alert went to Orange. In particular, Washington D.C. did. Alex Tabarrok went and studied crime rates when the alert level was Yellow (less police) and when it was Orange (more police). His study suggests that increasing police presence by 10% reduces crime by 4%. Because of the costs of each (crime is costlier than police) it's probably cost effective to start bumping up police presence significantly.

Paper can be found: http://mason.gmu.edu/~atabarro/TerrorAlertProofs.pdf

Profile

kingrat: (Default)
kingrat

July 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415 16 1718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 6th, 2025 09:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios